[INUG-Users] 3.6.1 Bi-Gateway Issue

[dxs 1997]

Yes.  it had been working for many months then just started with this
issue without any changes.

After working with a few IBMers, was able to narrow it down to the
gateway *is* writing, but each iduc cycle is taking longer and longer;
(up to 6 hours now since our last restart).  The reader does read.  I
tried without forwarding details and journal, same issue.  OS is
reporting very low usage.

Gateway is reporting high cpu and increasing memory usage.  the return
part of fthe gatewy works perfectly fine.

if i point it to the failover OS, i have the same results (however my
failover and primary are identical)...

i do have a support ticket, but am open ears to any ideas or experiences.

thx!


On Jan 9, 2008 9:54 AM, John Blake <jblake at arsenaldigital.com> wrote:
>
>  Is that 3.6.1 gateway "forward" compatible?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces at netcoolusers.org
>
> To: users at netcoolusers.org
> Subject: Re: [INUG-Users] 3.6.1 Bi-Gateway Issue
>
> as I mentioned earlier in my first email; there is a specific reason
> we are running 3.6.1 gateway and not the v7.
>
> On Jan 8, 2008 8:48 AM, John Blake <jblake at arsenaldigital.com> wrote:
> >  Try the version 7 gateway.
> >  Use it instead of the 3.6 one.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: users-bounces at netcoolusers.org
> > [mailto:users-bounces at netcoolusers.org] On Behalf Of dxs 1997
> > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 10:32 PM
> > To: users at netcoolusers.org
> > Subject: Re: [INUG-Users] 3.6.1 Bi-Gateway Issue
> >
> > the 7x is acting as a display (no events created on it).  the 3x is
> > forwarding events to the 7x.  a few minutes after killing the gateway;
> > i will see events stop coming into the 7x (via the event list; sorted
> > by LastOccurrence).
> >
> > once i kill the gateway, its starts populating into the 7x again.  the
> > gateway is installed on the 3x machine.  both OS profiles report that
> > the IDUC avg time is way under my granularity period.
> >
> > this *just* started happening this weekend with no OS or gateway
> > config changes; the gw and 7x OS were running fine, for the most part,
> > since we rolled them out.
> >
> > perhaps the problem is my OS, perhaps it is my gateway; i have bounced
> > both and the issue continues to occur.
> >
> > a bit stumped on this one. :-/  maybe some ideas will make me think of
> > something.
> >
> > thx!
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jan 7, 2008 10:07 PM, Blurry <obsfucate at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > So if you think the 3.x reader is working, does that mean you don't
> > > know if you're getting 3.x events on 7.x ? If debug isn't telling
> you
> > > anything, you could try running the 3.x gateway on a 3rd box
> pointing
> > > at the 2 object servers and see if the 3.x envir on the original box
> > > is to blame.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jan 7, 2008 9:35 PM, dxs 1997 <dxs1997 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hello All,
> > > >
> > > > I have a 3.6 bi-directional gateway between a 3x and 7x object
> > server.
> > > >   Out of the blue, the gateway writer to the 7x OS just stops
> > working;
> > > > no errors in either OS or gateway log files.    The reader from
> the
> > 7x
> > > > whose counterpart writes to the 3x works fine.  I *think* the
> reader
> > > > onthe 3x side is working.
> > > >
> > > > A kill of the nco_gate causes events to start back over.   As I
> > said,
> > > > no error messages in any of log files.  Strace provides no useful
> > > > output.
> > > >
> > > > Anybody got any ideas?
> > > >
> > > > thx for any help...
> > > >
> > > > ps. there is a specific reason i am running the 3.6.1 gateway and
> > not
> > > > the 7x, no need to ask about that :)
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Sent by the netcoolusers.org "users" mailing list
> > > > Post: users at netcoolusers.org
> > > > Unsubscribe: users-unsubscribe at netcoolusers.org
> > > > Search: http://lists.netcoolusers.org/archives/users/
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sent by the netcoolusers.org "users" mailing list
> > > Post: users at netcoolusers.org
> > > Unsubscribe: users-unsubscribe at netcoolusers.org
> > > Search: http://lists.netcoolusers.org/archives/users/
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent by the netcoolusers.org "users" mailing list
> > Post: users at netcoolusers.org
> > Unsubscribe: users-unsubscribe at netcoolusers.org
> > Search: http://lists.netcoolusers.org/archives/users/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent by the netcoolusers.org "users" mailing list
> > Post: users at netcoolusers.org
> > Unsubscribe: users-unsubscribe at netcoolusers.org
> > Search: http://lists.netcoolusers.org/archives/users/
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent by the netcoolusers.org "users" mailing list
> Post: users at netcoolusers.org
> Unsubscribe: users-unsubscribe at netcoolusers.org
> Search: http://lists.netcoolusers.org/archives/users/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent by the netcoolusers.org "users" mailing list
> Post: users at netcoolusers.org
> Unsubscribe: users-unsubscribe at netcoolusers.org
> Search: http://lists.netcoolusers.org/archives/users/
>